Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Legal cases
/

User loses 12.93 eth after binance dispute closure

User Claims 12.93 ETH Loss in Binance Dispute | Calls for Better Cross-Border Handling

By

Jessica Wright

Jun 26, 2026, 06:49 PM

Updated

Jun 27, 2026, 12:59 AM

2 minutes estimated to read

A person looking worried while checking a cryptocurrency trading platform on their laptop, showing frustration over a recent loss, with a digital coin graphic in the background.
popular

A Turkish user is speaking out after losing 12.93 ETH (around โ‚ฌ40,000) in a dispute with Binance, highlighting tensions surrounding how the platform manages cross-border issues. The user believes Binance acted prematurely by closing his case before authorities could intervene, despite a prosecutor's directive.

The Dispute's Background

Central to the incident is a P2P transaction. The user was instructed by the seller to complete the payment off-platform via Payeer after the seller's bank account was blocked. Trusting the seller's advice, he made the transfer, saying, "I was following the seller's payment instructions." However, the seller later claimed he had been hacked, prompting the user to report the situation to local authorities.

The prosecution instructed police to contact Binance and requested that the disputed funds remain frozen. Unfortunately, Binance closed the case citing a lack of communication from Turkish authorities and acted on information received from Vietnamese law enforcement, representing the seller. The user now feels exposed and vulnerable, questioning the protection offered in international disputes.

"Once thereโ€™s an active investigation, assets should not be released," the user asserted, reflecting sentiments echoed by commenters on various forums discussing the case.

Community Reactions

Reactions in user forums express a mix of accountability toward the user and criticism of Binance's actions. Some argue that the user's deviation from Binance's payment rules led to his loss:

  • "You breached the Terms of Service by not following the specified payment instructions," one commenter stated.

  • Another remarked, "You essentially handed your money over and lost it."

Despite this, others pointed out that the timing of Binance's actions during an active investigation raises serious concerns about international protocols. A comment read, "That's a rough situation because once they released the ETH, there wasn't much left to recover."

User's Experience

In his own words, the affected user expressed regret:

"I completely accept my mistake of using a different payment method, but it's hard to swallow that Binance didn't wait for the investigation to finish. I thought they would freeze the assets until Turkish authorities could respond. Instead, the case was closed, and my funds were gone."

The frustrations around this case reflect broader problems with international cryptocurrency transactions, particularly regarding how exchanges handle disputes that cross borders.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ”น The user lost โ‚ฌ40,000 (12.93 ETH) due to miscommunication and cross-border failures.

  • ๐Ÿ”น Binance released funds before Turkish authorities could make contact.

  • ๐Ÿ”น "Once there's an active investigation, assets should remain frozen," echoes a sentiment among commenters.

This situation underscores the complexities faced when cryptocurrency transactions extend across jurisdictions. Many are now wondering if stricter regulations are on the horizon to protect users involved in multi-country situations. As this case attracts more attention, it may indeed prompt discussions about necessary changes in how exchanges operate during disputes.