Edited By
Chloe Chen

A wave of dissatisfaction is rising among the crypto community as numerous posts, including ones detailing new articles on utility tokens for 2026, face unwarranted removal by automated filters. Users are questioning the point of sharing valuable insights if they risk disappearing without explanation.
This situation has become a hot topic on various forums as people notice their posts being swiftly filtered. "Whatโs the point of taking the time to write posts if theyโre just wiped by filters?" a user lamented, reflecting widespread discontent.
Comments from community members reveal recurring themes:
Automated Filter Issues: Many believe that the filters are overly aggressive, often removing legitimate content without cause. One user noted, "Itโs probably automatic; you need to message the mods."
Struggles with Moderation: Users are calling for more transparent moderation. "If you have something you think should stay up, send a message to the mods," one commenter suggested, emphasizing a proactive approach.
Decline in Engagement: A several users indicated feeling disillusioned with posting altogether. "Iโve almost entirely stopped posting here," reported one frustrated member.
Overall, the sentiment leans negative, with users feeling that important discussions are stifled. As one contributor put it, "Everything is fud here unless you claim hbar 10 dollars!"
"You need to message the mods to get posts reviewed."
๐ป Over-aggressive filters are leading to legitimate content being removed.
๐ฌ Community members are encouraged to reach out to moderators for post reviews.
๐ Many contributors are withdrawing from posting due to frustration.
The issue highlights a growing concern around content control in crypto forums, making users reconsider their participation in discussions and news sharing. As 2026 nears, dialogue around utility tokens is critical, but it seems users could face additional hurdles in their communication.
As conversations around utility tokens heat up, it's likely the filters will evolve alongside community feedback. Experts suggest there's a solid chance that moderation tools will either become more refined or face backlash, leading to a surge in calls for stricter guidelines on content removal. If these automated systems don't adapt, we could see a shift in community engagement, with many contributors minimizing their activity. The pressure may force platforms to strike a balance between safeguarding quality and promoting open dialogue, especially as the crypto space grows more complex and vital.
This situation mirrors the early days of social media platforms, where users often faced the dual challenge of establishing their voices while navigating stringent algorithms. Similar to how aspiring musicians battled label gatekeepers for exposure, crypto enthusiasts are now wrestling with digital filters that often misjudge valuable input. Just as some musicians found alternative channels to share their creativity, the crypto community might seek out new forums or platforms to express their insights, reinforcing the idea that innovation often springs from the limitations imposed by existing systems.