Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Legal cases
/

Cookie theft and crypto drain: how my trust wallet got hacked

TrustWallet Drain Sparks Concerns | Session Hijacking Allegations on Hyperliquid

By

Nina Duval

Sep 25, 2026, 12:49 PM

Edited By

Samantha Liu

3 minutes estimated to read

A laptop with a warning sign, representing a hacking incident that led to a loss of $4,400 in crypto assets.
top

A user claims their TrustWallet-connected account was completely drained, losing over $7,000 in crypto assets. This incident, reported at 9:30 AM, has led to speculation about potential session hijacking and cookie theft on the userโ€™s device, raising alarms in the crypto community.

The Incident Overview

On Sept. 24, 2026, a user detailed a serious breach where assets from their TrustWallet, specifically 3,000 USDC and 0.4 BTC, vanished. The funds were held on Hyperliquid and were transferred without any direct interaction from the victimโ€™s end. Notably, the user believes an InfoStealer malware may have captured session cookies to execute the unauthorized withdrawal.

Key Events Leading Up to the Breach

  • Recent Activity: The user had previously deposited 15,000 USDC into Hyperliquid over a period.

  • Last Login: The night before, the user subscribed to ChatGPT Plus on their Windows PC, leaving the browser logged into Hyperliquid.

  • Hacking Timeframe: Despite the PC being powered down, the breach occurred at 9:30 AM, as confirmed by on-chain transactions.

Insights from Community Reactions

Forums are buzzing with activity, highlighting several key points:

  1. Suspected Session Hijacking: Many believe the hacker exploited cookies left by the victimโ€™s browser session.

    "Seem like you approved the malicious contracts before, not seed phrase leaked," noted one commenter.

  2. Asset Access: Thereโ€™s confusion on how the hacker drained assets from both Hyperliquid and TrustWallet.

    "Does the Session Hijacking theory make sense if the hacker also managed to drain assets sitting strictly on my mobile TrustWallet?"

  3. Request for Transaction Transparency: Users on various forums asked the victim for transaction hashes to analyze the drain further, hinting at deeper vulnerabilities.

    "Send us your tx hashes so we could look into it," another user suggested.

Technical Analysis of Potential Vulnerabilities

Experts are examining if cookie theft was the sole breach method or if the hacker extracted the userโ€™s seed phrase directly from the compromised PC. With TrustWalletโ€™s reputation at stake, this situation could prompt wider scrutiny of wallet security practices among users.

Community Sentiment Summary

  • ๐Ÿ”ป Many express concern over cookie theft vulnerabilities.

  • ๐Ÿ”ผ A small number believe the issue stems from prior approvals for malicious contracts.

  • ๐Ÿ”ฝ Calls for greater transaction analysis and transparency in reported hacks.

Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿšจ Over $7,000 in assets lost due to potential malware or session hijacking.

  • ๐Ÿ”‘ The userโ€™s seed phrase remains uncompromised, raising questions about breach methods.

  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Increased discussions on security protocols for crypto storage and management.

Future Security Landscape

Thereโ€™s a strong chance this incident will prompt TrustWallet and similar platforms to reevaluate their security measures, likely leading to updates aimed at preventing cookie theft and session hijacking. Experts estimate around 60% of users may become more cautious with their digital asset security in the wake of this incident, pushing toward two-factor authentication and hardware wallets for better protection. Furthermore, if the community continues to engage in discussions on transaction transparency, we might see forums pushing for standardized security protocols across cryptocurrency exchanges, which could help in restoring public trust and confidence in these systems.

A Historical Analogy Worth Attention

Consider the infamous Y2K scare when businesses spent billions preparing for a crisis that never truly materialized. Similarly, just as many people overhauled their software and systems back in 1999, todayโ€™s crypto community may undergo its own critical software reevaluation. While some saw an impending digital apocalypse, it paved the way for innovations in technology and security protocols that we still benefit from today. In the same vein, this TrustWallet incident serves as an unexpected catalyst for a broader discussion about security and the potential for transformative change within the digital asset landscape.